5.2C
Madrid
Thursday, December 2, 2021

Fear Street Part 3: 1666 Review: Netflix’s Horror Trilogy Wraps Up With A Drama Jingle

This Netflix horror trilogy fails to deliver the supernatural horror that its predecessors have built up.

Must read

Khushant Runghe
Khushant Runghe
Khushant Runghe is an Indian journalist covering the entertainment industry. He has a special drive for reviewing movies, series, anime, comics and movies.

INDIA: Fear Street: 1666, the slasher genre harkens back to a period akin to the Salem Witch Trials. Deena (Kiana Madeira) experiences a vision of the events of 1666 as seen through the eyes of Sarah Fier herself, after rejoining Sarah Fier’s severed hand with the rest of her body. The only uncertainty is whether the Shadyside’s dreadful history will finally come to an end.


Fear Street: 1666 covers the beginnings of the Shadyside curse and the witch trial that set it off. Following the vision, at the end of Fear Street Part Two: 1978, the plot unfolds through the perspective of Sarah Fier. Her father George (Randy Havens) and brother Henry (Benjamin Flores Jr) dwell in Union, the original village before it was divided into Sunnyvale and Shadyside.

- Advertisement -


Pastor Cyrus Miller (Michael Chandler) and his daughter Hannah (Olivia Welch) are among the town’s residents (whom Sarah adores). Mad Thomas (McCabe Slye), an alcoholic, is a figure who elicits a great deal of rage. Sheriff Nick Goode’s ancestor Solomon Goode (Ashley Zukerman) has a pleasant and supportive character. Because of shoddy and inconsistent writing, Solomon Goode’s character in Fear Street has worsened.


The plot becomes too predictable as the story progresses. The film’s frightening factor simply vanishes. There isn’t much horror in the picture, and it’s mostly replaced by an overabundance of dramatic elements. The movie’s entire concept is degraded by the forced emotional sequences.

- Advertisement -


The conclusion reached by some characters is unreasonable. The serial killers of Fear Street becomes a parody in the climactic sequence, and the slasher component is utterly reduced to a childish scuffle. The hype built up by its predecessors has been entirely squandered.
Despite its fundamental problems in terms of plot, the movie excels in terms of its 1666 setting. The witch hunts were illustrated with a few errors, but they nevertheless fit the story flow. The 1666 premise of the village and its surroundings completely builds a fear factor, but it ultimately fails to deliver. The sole horrible factor that creates fear and disgust is Pastor Cyrus Miller’s slaughter of children.

Also Read: Fear Street Part One: 1994 Review: A Revisit To Slasher Genre With 90’s Nostalgia

- Advertisement -


This Netflix horror trilogy fails to deliver the supernatural horror that its predecessors have built up. Despite the bloodshed and violence, the film’s horror section falls short of capturing the slasher effect. In the end, it’s a film with no space for terror, and the atmosphere created at the beginning of the film is utterly shattered. This ambitious horror trilogy has been completely transformed into a drama film with some gore and violence and is unsuitable for horror fans of any genre.
Transcontinental Times rating: 2.8/5

Contributor

  • Khushant Runghe

    Khushant Runghe is an Indian journalist covering the entertainment industry. He has a special drive for reviewing movies, series, anime, comics and movies.

- Advertisement -

Archives

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest articles